Tag Archives: #prostatecancer

Cancer – Prostate

© 2017            

By Keith S. Wexler, MBA, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Prenatal Diagnosis and Biotech/Life Sciences Consultant, GENASSIST, Inc.

Paul Wexler, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., Medical Director, GENASSIST, Inc.

Clinical Professor, Department of OB/GYN, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Clinical Professor, Division of Genetics/Dept. of Pediatrics, Univ. of Colorado/The Children’s Hospital

Prostate Cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Skin cancer is number one for men.

For many years Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and blood Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was accepted as the best screening modality to be used in men, usually over the age of 50 years.

However, with the recognition in the variability in the course of prostate cancer, from rapid progression to little or no progression for many years, and the risk of both diagnostic and treatment approaches and false positive and false negative results, the use of PSA for routine prostate cancer screening has come under greater scrutiny.

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/moreinformation/prostatecancerearlydetection/prostate-cancer-early-detection-acs-recommendations

Most urologists and the American Urological Association support the benefits of PSA screening for men between ages 55 to 70 years, at two year intervals, as outweighing possible risks.

Urologists also emphasize that PSA screening should not take place until the risks and benefits of the PSA screening are discussed thoroughly with the patient.

The American Urological Association did not recommend routine PSA screening in men under the age of 55 years or over 70 years.

Men diagnosed with probable Low Grade Prostate Cancer might be candidates for active surveillance rather than treatment. Some men with Low Grade Prostate Cancer might choose probable curative approaches despite the potential risks.

The availability of genomic testing for men diagnosed with Prostate Cancer or men at increased risk for Prostate Cancer might allow stratification of men into different risk and treatment strategies.

But at the present time genomic testing has not helped plot a course of monitoring and treatment of Prostate Cancer nor added to the use of standard parameters such as:

  • Age of patient
  • Grade of tumor
  • PSA levels
  • Stage of Disease

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and an expanded MRI technique called Multiparametric MRI may allow earlier and more accurate diagnosis and more focused prostate biopsy and prostate tumor grading by helping clinicians to better distinguish between indolent from more aggressive tumors.

Possible chromosomes and genes associated with increased susceptibility to Prostate Cancer were identified as:

  • Chromosome 8 (8q24)
  • Chromosome 17 (17q)
  • Gene *MSMB1- Chromosome 10 (10q11.2)
  • Gene LMTK2 – Chromosome 7 (7q21.3-q22.1)
  • Gene KLK3 – Chromosome 19 (19q13.33)

Gene HNF1B – Chromosome 17 (17q12)*The MSMB gene and closely associated gene NCOA4 is involved in Androgen Receptor Activity.

Prostate Cancer

Prostrate Cancer© 2016
By Keith S. Wexler, MBA,
Facilitator of Information, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Prenatal Diagnosis and Biotech Consultant, GENASSIST™, Inc.

Prostate Cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Skin cancer is number one for men. For many years Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and blood Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was accepted as the best screening modality to be used in men, usually over the age of 50 years.

However, with the recognition in the variability in the course of prostate cancer, from rapid progression to little or no progression for many years, and the risk of both diagnostic and treatment approaches and false positive and false negative results, the use of PSA for routine prostate cancer screening has come under greater scrutiny.

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/moreinformation/prostatecancerearlydetection/prostate-cancer-early-detection-acs-recommendations

Most urologists and the American Urological Association support the benefits of PSA screening for men between ages 55 to 70 years, at two year intervals, as outweighing possible risks. Urologists also emphasize that PSA screening should not take place until the risks and benefits of the PSA screening are discussed thoroughly with the patient.

The American Urological Association did not recommend routine PSA screening in men under the age of 55 years or over 70 years.

Men diagnosed with probable Low Grade Prostate Cancer might be candidates for active surveillance rather than treatment. Some men with Low Grade Prostate Cancer might choose probable curative approaches despite the potential risks.

The availability of genomic testing for men diagnosed with Prostate Cancer or men at increased risk for Prostate Cancer might allow stratification of men into different risk and treatment strategies. But at the present time genomic testing has not helped plot a course of monitoring and treatment of Prostate Cancer nor added to the use of standard parameters such as:

  • Age of patient
  • Grade of tumor
  • PSA levels
  • Stage of Disease

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and an expanded MRI technique called Multiparametric MRI may allow earlier and more accurate diagnosis and more focused prostate biopsy and prostate tumor grading by helping clinicians to better distinguish between indolent from more aggressive tumors.

Possible chromosomes and genes associated with increased susceptibility to Prostate Cancer were identified as:

  • Chromosome 8 (8q24)
  • Chromosome 17 (17q)
  • Gene *MSMB1- Chromosome 10 (10q11.2)
  • Gene LMTK2 – Chromosome 7 (7q21.3-q22.1)
  • Gene KLK3 – Chromosome 19 (19q13.33)
  • Gene HNF1B – Chromosome 17 (17q12)

*The MSMB gene and closely associated gene NCOA4 is involved in Androgen Receptor Activity.

ABC’s of Disease

ABCs of Disease© 2018, GENASSIST, Inc.

By Keith S. Wexler, MBA, CFO, CIO, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Prenatal Diagnosis and Biotech/Life Sciences Consultant, GENASSIST™, Inc. 
 
I am a Facilitator of InformationHelping Patients Access Breakthrough Technologies – Timely Information Optimizes Outcome!

I have learned over the past 30 years working for a medical genetics company that when a patient(s) gets a test result (i.e. his/her baby has been diagnosed with Down Syndrome, his/her father was recently diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s (ALS) disease or the patient is told she/he has breast cancer or prostate cancer respectively), the patient(s) just wants information and they want it now!
 
On an average day, we get receive over 100 “cold calls” from patients all over the country and lately from all over the world, that are being told that they will have to wait weeks or months before they will be able to meet with a “specialist” (i.e. Disease Specialist, Geneticist, Genetic Counselor, Medical Doctor etc..) who will talk with them or help them gather enough information to pave an educated road map for their care and/or treatment.

A few years ago at a national meeting, one of the speakers when asked why it is taking on average 7 to 9 months to get in and been seen by a “genetic counselor”, the reply was “There is no such thing as a genetic emergency”.  In 2018 this “wait list” has grown to 9 to 12 months and in some parts of the country to over 40 months.
 
As more tests become available and more patients seek testing, there is an obvious logjam that is taking place due to the ever increasing volume of patients desiring information and “interpretation” of test results and the finite number of healthcare providers who are able to meet with patients to discuss test results.

This “Take a Number and Get in Line Model” is what led to the creation of this website.

On October 1, 2015 the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control released International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) which is designed to “enable greater specificity in identifying health conditions”1 which some estimates put at over 12,000 disease categories.

1 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm_pcs_background.htm

This website is intended to create a global community of patients and their families, healthcare providers, biotech companies, insurance companies etc…to encourage the sharing of information.

I encourage any and all to join our global village!

Contact GENASSIST™

Fill out my online form.